ການດໍາເນີນຄະດີແພ່ງຂອງສານປະຊາຊົນພາກກາງ

Abstract

ບົດຄວາມເລື່ອງ ການດໍາເນີນຄະດີແພ່ງຂອງສານປະຊາຊົນພາກກາງ ປະກອບມີ 2 ຈຸດປະສົງຄື ການຈັດຕັ້ງປະຕິບັດການດໍາເນີນຄະດີແພ່ງ ຂອງສານປະຊາຊົນພາກກາງໃນໄລຍະຜ່ານມາ ແລະ ແນວທາງປັບປຸງແກ້ໄຂການຈັດຕັ້ງປະຕິບັດການດໍາເນີນຄະດີແພ່ງ ຂອງສານປະຊາຊົນພາກກາງໃນອະນາຄົດ, ເປັນການສຶກສາແບບຄຸນນະພາບ, ໂດຍໃຊ້ເຄື່ອງມືແບບສໍາພາດ ສໍາພາດກຸ່ມເປົ້າໝາຍແມ່ນບຸກຄົນສໍາຄັນພາຍໃນສານປະຊາຊົນພາກກາງ ຈໍານວນ 10 ທ່ານ, ວິເຄາະຂໍ້ມູນແບບເນື້ອໃນ ແລະ ຜົນການສຶກສາພົບວ່າ: ການດໍາເນີນຄະດີແພ່ງຂອງສານປະຊາຊົນພາກກາງໃນໄລຍະຜ່ານມາ ດ້ານການ​ຮັບ​ສຳ​ນວນ​ຄະ​ດີ​ ​ມີ​ຄວາມ​ລະ​ອຽດ​ອ່ອນ​ສົມ​ຄວນ ແລະ ປະຕິບັດເປັນຂັ້ນຕອນໄດ້, ດ້ານການຄົ້ນຄວ້າສໍານວນຄະດີ ມີຕາລາງໃນການເຮັດວຽກ, ດ້ານການກະກຽມປະຊຸມສານ ປະທານສານຈະເປັນຜູ້ອອກຂໍ້ຕົກລົງແຕ່ງຕັ້ງຄະນະສານ ກໍານົດວັນເວລາ ແລະ ຈ່າສານ ຈະເປັນຜູ້ອອກໝາຍຮຽກ-ໝາຍເຊີນເຖິງຄູ່ຄວາມ ແລະ ພາກສ່ວນທີ່ກຽ່ວຂ້ອງເພື່ອເຂົ້າຮ່ວມປະຊຸມສານ, ໃນເວລາໄຕສວນໃນທີ່ປະຊຸມສານພົບບາງບັນຫາຄື ຜູ້ທີ່ຖືກແຕ່ງຕັ້ງເປັນຄະນະສານບາງຄັ້ງຍັງກໍາເນື້ອໃນຂອງຄະດີບໍ່ລະອຽດ ບໍ່ຕັ້ງປະເດັນການໄຕ່ສ່ວນ ແລະ ຄູ່ຄວາມບາງຈໍານວນບໍ່ໃຫ້ການເຄົາລົບໃນເວລາປະຊຸມສານ, ໃນການໄຕ່ສວນຄະດີ ທຸກທ່ານທີ່ເຂົ້າຮ່ວມສາມາດຖາມໄດ້ແຕ່ຕ້ອງໄດ້ຂໍອະນຸຍາດຈາກຜູ້ທີ່ເປັນປະທານກອງປະຊຸມ, ການຂຽນຄໍາພິພາກສາແມ່ນເປັນໄປຕາມຜົນການຕົກລົງຂອງຄະນະສານທີ່ຂຶ້ນບັນລັງ ແຕ່ກໍຍັງມີຈຸດອ່ອນ ຍ້ອນວ່າ ການຂຽນຄໍາພິພາກສາບໍ່ຮັດກຸມ ບາງກໍລະນີ ມີການແກ່ຍາວເວລາຕາມກົດໝາຍແລ້ວພາຍຫຼັງພິພາກສາແລ້ວ 20 ວັນ.

ແນວທາງປັບປຸງແກ້ໄຂການຈັດຕັ້ງປະຕິບັດການດໍາເນີນຄະດີແພ່ງ ຂອງສານປະຊາຊົນພາກກາງໃນອະນາຄົດ ດ້ານແນວທາງໃນການປັບປຸງແກ້ໄຂການຮັບສໍານວນຄະດີ ຄວນປັບປຸງຂັ້ນຕອນໃຫ້ໄວຂຶ້ນ, ແນວທາງໃນປັບປຸງແກ້ໄຂການຄົ້ນຄວ້າສໍານວນຄະດີ ຄວນ​ມີ​ພາວ​ເວີ​ພ້ອຍ​ໃນເວລາສະຫຼຸບລາຍງານຂໍ້ມູນຫຼັກຖານໃນສຳ​ນວນ​ຄະ​ດີ​ທຸກ​ຄັ້ງ​, ແນວທາງໃນປັບປຸງແກ້ໄຂການກະກຽມປະຊຸມສານ ຜູ້ພິພາກສາຕ້ອງເອົາໃຈໃສ່ຕິດຕາມຊຸກຍູ້ໃນການຄົ້ນຄ້ວາຄະດີຢ່າງໃກ້ຊິດ ວ່າຄະດີດັ່ງກ່າວຍັງຄາຢູ່ຈຸດໃດ ບັນຫາໃດ ເພື່ອຊ່ວຍແນະນໍາວິທີທາງໃຫ້ໄວຂຶ້ນ ເພື່ອເຮັດ​ໃຫ້​ຄະ​ດີ​ຄວາມບໍ່​ແກ້​ຍາວ​ເວ​ລາ, ແນວທາງໃນປັບປຸງແກ້ໄຂການດໍາເນີນການໄຕ່ສວນຄະດີ ຜູ້ພິພາກສາຄວນເອົາໃຈ ໃສ່ ເມື່ອໄດ້ຮັບການແຕ່ງຕັ້ງເປັນປະທານຄະນະສານຂຶ້ນຕັດສິນ ຄວນທໍາຄວາມເຂົ້າໃຈກັບເນື້ອຄະດີ ແລະ ກະກຽມປະເດັນບັນຫາກ່ອນຈະສອບສວນ ເພື່ອຫຼີກລຽ່ງການສອບສວນອອກນອກປະເດັນ, ຈ່າສານຄວນ​ຕິດ​ຕາມກວດ​ກາ​ຄູ່ຄວາມຢ່າງ​ໃກ້ຊິດ ກ່ຽວ​ກັບການໄດ້ຮັບໝາຍຮຽກ, ໝາຍເຊີນ ຫຼື ບໍ່ ເພື່ອຫຼີກລ່ຽງ​ການ​ເລື່​ອນ​ປະ​ຊຸມ​ສານ ແລະ ແກ່​ຍາ​ວເວລາໃນການພິພາກສາຄະດີ ແລະ ແນວທາງໃນປັບປຸງແກ້ໄຂການຂຽນຄໍາພິພາກສາ ການຂຽນຄໍາພິພາກສາຕ້ອງໄປຕາມຮ່າງທີ່ກໍານົດໄວ້ ແລະ ໄປຕາມຜົນການຕົກລົງຂອງຄະນະສານທີ່ຂຶ້ນບັນລັງ, ການ​ວິ​ນິ​ດໄສ ຕ້ອງຕອບແກ້ທຸກປະເດັນບັນຫາທີ່ຄູ່ຄວາມບໍ່ພໍໃຈ ໂດຍຖືເອົາມາດຕາຂອງກົດໝາຍມາເປັນບ່ອນອີງ ຄວນມີການຝຶກອົບຮົມວິທີການຂຽນຄໍາພິພາກສາໃຫ້ພະນັກງານໃນແຕ່ລະປີ.

The Implementation of Civil Litigation of the Central Region People's Court consists of two objectives: the implementation of civil litigation of the Central Region People's Court in the past; and ways to improve the implementation of the civil litigation of the Central Region People's Court in the future, it is a qualitative study, the target group includes 16 people and indepth interview was used as a tool, with the analysis of the contents and the results of the study found that:

The implementation of civil litigation of the Central Region People's Court in the past, in terms of receiving case statements, it is quite sensitive and can be carried out in a step-by-step manner; in terms of considering case statements, the court has a working schedule, reports every month and all employees are highly responsible; in terms of preparing for court meetings, the president of the court will be the one to issue the agreement to appoint the court panel, set the date and time, and the registrar will be the one to issue calling invitations to the parties and related parties to attend the court meeting. Preparation of the court meeting, the head of the court committee and the judge will make a plan together with the registrar to bring the case to court each time. When the date of the court meeting is set, the appointed person will be the chairperson of the court meeting. Each step is carefully carried out. The registrar will be the one to announce the regulations in the court meeting for the parties and those attending the court meeting. During the investigating time in the court meeting, some problems were found, such as those who were appointed to the court sometimes did not comprehensively recognize the contents of the case in detail, did not set the issue of the trial and the number of parties, did not give respect during the court meeting and could not answer the questions that the court asks. The investigation process that the court sat on the throne with 3 members, the hearing of the case, all the participants can ask questions but must ask for the permission of the chairperson of the meeting. The writing of the judgment is based on the agreement of the judges that sit on the throne, but there are still weak points because the writing of the judgment is not well oriented, does not solve all the issues that the parties are not satisfied with and in some cases, there is an extension of time according to the law after 20 days after the judgment, the judgment must be completed, however, it sometimes cannot perform.

In regard to ways for improving the implementation of civil litigation of the Central Region People's Court in the future, it suggests that the process of receiving case statements should be improved faster; the case consideration should have a PowerPoint when summarizing the report of evidence in each case. In considering cases, ways for improving the preparation of court meetings, the judge must pay close attention to follow up in considering the case to see where the case is still pending and what the problem is to help suggest a way to accerlerate the case so that the case does not have to be resolved in a long time and can be adjudicated. For improving the judgement, the judge should pay more attention when being appointed as the chairperson of the court to make a judgement. The person should understand the content of the case and prepare the issues before the investigation to avoid going off track, the registrar should closely monitor if the parties received a summons, invitation or not in order to avoid postponement of the court meeting and prolonging the time in judging the case; and the way to improve the writing of the judgment, the writing of the judgment must follow the prescribed draft and follow the agreement of the court that ascended the throne, the writing must be written in detail with comprehensive and complete content. The diagnosis must answer all the issues that the parties are not satisfied with based on the law as, there should be training on how to write judgments for employees every year.